Search for: "Anup Surendranath"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 2:42 pm
We are very happy to announce that Anup Surendranath has agreed to join the blog team at LAOT. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 11:33 am
Anup Surendranath and Gale Andrew (National Law University, Delhi and Project 39A, National Law University Delhi) have posted State Legal Aid and Undertrials: Are There No Takers? [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 11:41 am
Anup Surendranath's analysis of the case is available here. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:09 am
Therecent Presidential assent for the 2010 Madhya Pradesh Govansh Vadh Pratishedh(Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam (notified on 31 December 2011 in the M.P ExtraordinaryGazette No. 594 and hereinafter referred to as the ‘2010 M.P law’) hasinvited a lot of attention and the provisions in the Act on the burden ofproof, powers of arrest and quantum of punishment particularly so. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
When narratives on the Supreme Court’s enforcement of socio-economic rights are written, the judgment of the Court upholding the constitutionality of the Right to Education Act, 2009 will probably enjoy pride of place. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 3:39 am
This number shot up to 52, or 31.5%, out of 165 cases in 2022.Anup Surendranath, law professor and executive director of Project 39A, says the increased numbers also reflect the growing trend in trial courts. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
In the Society for Un-Aided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:43 am
The recent decision by a two judge bench of the Supreme Court(Justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Desai) in Rameshbhai Dabhai Naika v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:26 pm
Anup Surendranath’s recent post on the Madhya Pradesh anti-cow slaughter law is an interesting and timely intervention on the nature of the broader legal discourse on cow slaughter. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 9:25 pm
Anup Surendranath, Executive Director, Project 39A, and Professor, National Law University, Delhi· Ms. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:40 am
On the point of questions of law, like the Supreme Court, the Patna High Court too has made the same mistake that Anup Surendranath has pointed out on this blog – that of conflating the denial of voting rights under s. 62(5) of the 1951 Act and the disqualification of being on an electoral roll under s. 16(1)(c) of the 1950 Act. [read post]
