Search for: "People v. Janis" Results 1 - 20 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark Janis: Eligibility provisions: there’s a history of ex ante detailed legislative specification of product categories, and a second more abstract approach that uses the word “design” and throws in something about functional characteristics. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
W/in institutions (schools, guilds, etc.) differences b/t the kinds of people who call themselves engineers and those who call themselves designers—histories, including gendered histories, of this. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Even people who have the power to do unpopular things might sometimes hesitate to exercise such power. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Another argument for escalation: check if these are lyrics/if there’s an identifiable person “Janie. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am by MBettman
Janis, 428 U.S. 433 (1976) (“If . . . the exclusionary rule does not result in appreciable deterrence, then, clearly, its use in the instant situation is unwarranted. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm by Ben
People are celebrating, children are overcome with excitement and everyone can't stop talking about it. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
In Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Janis: DuMont & Janis continue work on 19thc. design patent law. [read post]