Search for: "People v. Mateo" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Instead, O’Connor applied for a job with the San Mateo County government, where she agreed to work for free until the office could find funding for her. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am by madeo-design
While there, she gained fame for “saving” Major League Baseball with her strike-ending decision in Silverman v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:44 pm by Josh Richman
  For the complaint: https://eff.org/document/abo-comix-v-county-san-mateo-complaint Contact:  HannahZhaoStaff Attorneyzhao@eff.org CaraGaglianoStaff Attorneycara@eff.org [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am by Clara Apt
Deliver on Climate Security for the Indo-Pacificby Caroline Baxter and Erin Sikorsky (@ErinSikorsky) (May 21, 2021)  The Mining Gap: Critical Minerals and Geopolitical Competitionby Gregory Brew (@gbrew24) and Morgan Bazilian (@MBazilian) (November 7, 2022)  China, Climate Change, Credibility: Why It’s (Finally) Time for the US to Join the Law of the Sea Convention by Mark Nevitt (@marknevitt) (September 23, 2021)  One Key Instrument to Confront China and Climate Changeby Bishop… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 7:57 pm by Uthman Law Office
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
Huq, a British firm which sells people’s location data, has admitted that some of its information was gained without seeking permission from users. [read post]