Search for: "People v. Matthews (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 And for the record, as most people reading this know, I am radically pro-choice and also have always thought Roe and Casey were wrongly decided (30-40 years from now the right to choose will most likely be stronger than at any time between 1980-2022). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Last week, Judge Rosenstengel found Wells’ opinion so infected by invalid methodologies and inferences as to be inadmissible under the most recent version of Rule 702.[1] Summary judgment in the trial cases followed.[2] Back in the 1980s, paraquat gained some legal notoriety in one of the most retrograde Rule 702 decisions.[3] Both the herbicide and Rule 702, however, and they remain in wide use. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
 Two epidemiologic studies of PPA and hemorrhagic stroke were conducted in the 1980s. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
 Pix credit hereCates 1980 has distributed its February 2024 Report. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They are literally the only people whose opinions genuinely count in his version of the law. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The claim was out of limitation and there was no reason as to why section 32A of the Limitation Act 1980 should apply. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Since the early 1980s, there has been an increasingly expansive understanding of access to justice and an embrace in particular of the idea that access to civil and family justice is principally about having paths available for citizens to prevent, address and resolve the legal challenges and problems they face in their everyday lives. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:36 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Steve Vladeck analyzed the dissent in Doe v. [read post]