Search for: "People v. Rebeles"
Results 1 - 20
of 303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
This may extend to keeping the very existence of the warrant under seal until the time of arrest, as has been done in some cases involving members of rebel groups (e.g. here). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am
Patty Gerstenblith, Distinguished Research Professor of Law at DePaul University, stated during her keynote address at the Kernochan Center’s symposium on Protecting Cultural Property, the significance of the destruction of cultural heritage sites “lies in the people. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am
” Note: Readers may be interested in our South Africa v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:01 am
Gottlieb, Bush v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
I was not surprised by the outcome or even the unanimity of the result in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:11 pm
But that was in large part because a comparable number of rebels were spread over a larger area. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Section 3 applied to South Carolina rebels. [read post]