Search for: "People v. Sellers (1988)"
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
From today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in Book People, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
Village of Hoffman Estates, 844 F.2d 461, 464 (7th Cir. 1988). [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
” In 1933, the year the Securities Act was enacted, Roosevelt said, “It changes the ancient doctrine of caveat emptor to ‘let the seller beware,’ and puts the burden on the seller rather than on the buyer. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
App. 3d 989, 1003 (1988). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
App. 3d 989, 1003 (1988). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
It was a common target of short sellers. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am
When two people are married and buy real estate, there are incredible incentives to hold the property jointly. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:48 am
United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988). [9] See Memorandum of Law in support of Defendant General Electric Company’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, in DeVries v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Part of having transparency in the tax code is having the people’s representatives decide if there will be a tax increase. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
The Sullivan Cases Abernathy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
”) Bowman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
Campbell, 175 Mich App 629; 438 N.W.2d 267 (1988); City of Detroit v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
But people wish they could afford the protections of a lawyer’s solicitor-client relationship instead of having to depend upon merely LegalZoom’s buyer-seller relationship. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
