Search for: "People v. Slough"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm
It doesn’t have the right senior people working together as peers…. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am
This argument has never been tested by the UK or EU courts, instead only arising when there is an underlying disability that prevents carrying a pregnancy (Murphy v Slough Borough Council [2005] ICR 721; Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:169; Case C-363/12 Z v A (Re Equal Treatment) ECLI:EU:C:2014:159). [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:50 pm
"] From Griffin v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 6:09 pm
Tyson (1842) and Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Congress cannot avoid this responsibility by sloughing off authority to the executive.Again, McGinnis cites no text or history for these ideas. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
Your taxes are going up. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 5:16 am
Putin sloughed off the "killer" accusation as macho Hollywood talk of the sort people in America go in for. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:42 pm
From Guerrero v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
(Justice Slough says "[T]hat’s just a detail, not a material change to her testimony. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
How many people in your home have a smartphone? [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
In People ex rel Becerra v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
Following the Court of Appeal decision in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1484 a public authority will not be allowed to rely on a defence of qualified privilege if such reliance is incompatible with the claimant’s right to respect for his private and family life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
Second, it may be noted that Dr Butt’s case raises questions similar to those considered by the Court of Appeal in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] 1 WLR 1774, namely the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 impacts upon defences available to public authorities to negate tortious liability. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” President Andrew Jackson famously responded to the Supreme Court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
The result – which was positive for GS – is potentially of considerable assistance for similar people. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:28 am
The case of Reckis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
” Part 1 and Part 2 – Paul Bernal Is following people illegal? [read post]
