Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 1 - 20
of 6,088
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
All it means, as Khan said in an interview Monday, is that “no people anywhere are saints. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:15 pm
Many insurance adjusters are fine people who want to do the right thing, but their insurance companies require them to frequently deny claims if possible because they’re concerned with the bottom-line. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
| Scholar argues that FDA should be the sole regulator of cell-cultured meat. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:00 am
NIH has since paused clinical trials for 3K3A-APC, a stroke drug sponsored by ZZ Biotech, a Houston-based company co-founded by Berislav V. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
Law might not be the first solution one wouldthink of given that it is often considered to create confusion, delay action and might pos-sibly discourage goodwill.Yet it should be clear, that if we want to bring about change in the long run, it is insuf-ficient to rely solely on civic virtue and/or trust in science to mitigate climate change. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
It is possible to identify three areas of current interest in relation to the control of cognition to advance the interests and aspiration of ideologically driven human collectives. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
In the year after Plessy v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC argues that the proposed acquisition would result in “substantial effects on employment wages, benefits and conditions for people who work for or seek employment from the parties and their brands. [read post]
6 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Hill v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
These are the most important principles imposed to date, yet they are non-binding, since the signatory nations are not obligated to implement them within their respective legal systems, serving solely as guidelines. [read post]