Search for: "People v. Wells (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Here are ten representative examples of Alito's awful behavior.1) In 1985, Alito applied for a job in the Ronald Reagan Justice Department. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Among other powers, the governor "shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed" (NY Const, art IV, § 3), which "include[s] [*2]the power to enforce and implement legislative enactments" (Under 21, Catholic Home Bur. for Dependent Children v City of New York, 65 NY2d 344, 356 [1985]). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The agency deferred a proposed 1985 final monograph because of the blood pressure issue. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
Secretary General, States, and competent U.N. bodies; drawing up a Statute for a permanent international penal tribunal for trying the crime of apartheid as envisaged by Article V of the Convention; and drawing attention to the role of transnational corporations in sustaining apartheid in Southern Africa. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:17 am
Co., 64 N.Y.2d 846, 848, 476 N.E.2d 640, 641, 487 N.Y.S.2d 314, 315 (1985) 2 Seaboard Surety Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Freedom of speech and other core rights had only been restored in 1985, well within the living memories of their public and of many officials in their court system. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Edward White, 4500 pages of manuscript. [19] A new target was set for 1985, the fiftieth anniversary of Holmes’ death. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
At bottom, ruling in favor of Big Tech in NetChoice would effectively require the Supreme Court to disregard decades of First Amendment precedent and throw asunder legions of well-established antidiscrimination laws. [read post]