Search for: "Person v. Clayton" Results 1 - 20 of 608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2024, 11:42 am by bklemm@foley.com
They also argued that the landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision that the EEOC relied upon, Bostock v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Clayton County (in which the Supreme Court held that firing transgender employees on the basis of their gender identity violates federal employment discrimination laws) drawing distinctions on the basis of gender identity constitute prohibited action on the basis of sex. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm by James A. Holt and Veronica Miclot
Clayton County The Guidance also addresses the expansion of Title VII’s coverage concerning sex and gender under Bostock v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The complaint alleges LiveRamp’s profiling system links their browsing activity to their personal identity and the company processes personal data without a legal basis. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:39 am by SHG
Clayton County, Georgia, the Supreme Court held that an employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender unconstitutionally discriminates against that person because of sex under Title VII. [read post]