Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In Panuwat, the defendant was an employee of Medivation, Inc., a mid-cap oncology firm that was resisting one hostile bidder (Sanofi S.A.) and encouraging another firm (Pfizer) to outbid Sanofi. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
Cir. 2018), Arnold Partnership v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued two Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the Pfizer, Inc. and the ModernaTX, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:48 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 2009 WL 3320272, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
</span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <h2> <span style="font-weight: bold; display: initial;"> Patent Law </span> </h2> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> … [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
All this suggests that providing pseudonymity to members of particular religious groups might violate the principle of the Texas Monthly v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Tuesday 22nd February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Competition and Markets Authority v Pfizer Inc and Flynn Pharma Ltd, on appeal from [2020] EWCA 617. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 10:21 am
Children’s Health Defense v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:30 am
There are some unique facts here, but in insider trading lingo, trading based on confidential info from an employer looks a lot like “misappropriation” – which the Supreme Court upheld as a theory of liability in 1997, in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:16 am
§ 1391(c)(3) allows the lawsuit in N.J. against the foreign corporation: (3) a defendant not resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
Twelve Lots of CHANTIX® (Varenicline) Tablets have been recalled by Pfizer due to N-Nitroso Varenicline content above ADI level. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
