Search for: "Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Research Services, Inc. v. FDA" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am by Ashley Morgan
Crude oil contains metals such as Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Nickel (Ni), and Vanadium (V). [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm by Michael Grossman
Both drugs are manufactured by Janssen Pharmaceutical, a subsidiary of the parent corporation Johnson & Johnson. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
  FDA regulated manufacturers of prescription medical products aren’t snakeoil salesmen, payday lenders, reverse mortgage peddlers, or participants in some other “relatively common cash and credit transactions in which [consumers] engage on a regular basis. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
  This Court has already resolved that issue in favor of the Plaintiffs in light of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
Happy Birthday LEXIS/NEXIS, whose legal research service went up on this date back in 1973. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
  In In re Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
While the case law is clear that manufacturers may modify the contents of a brand-name drug label without FDA approval by adding to or strengthening the warnings, [plaintiff] has provided no authority − and the Court’s research reveals no authority − to suggest manufacturers may do the same with the label’s formatting. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., 2013 WL 1191899 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
McNeil-PPC, Inc., 2009 WL 1178651, at *3-4 (Pa. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  A plaintiff must also allege the federal government has established that the drug manufacturer either committed fraud against the FDA or bribed an FDA official.White v. [read post]