Search for: "Phipps v. Phipps" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
It is an established principle of law, restated by the House of Lords in Boardman v Phipps (1967), that the relevant question to ask is whether ‘the reasonable man’ (a common benchmark in legal tests), looking at the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case, would think that there was a ‘real sensible possibility’ of conflict (known as the ‘conflict of interest rule’). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
There was also a hearing in the case of Price v Newsquest Media Group. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Over the past several years, the use of non-disclosure agreements (“NDAs”) has received significant public scrutiny following their controversial use in a number of high profile harassment claims.[1] NDAs were back in the headlines earlier this year following the leak to the Telegraph of around 100,000 Whatsapp messages belonging to the former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock.[2] The messages, which revealed Mr Hancock’s communications with other members of the government during… [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In a startling break with tradition, this week's vocab quiz comes from Judge Phipps of the Third Circuit: parsimony, autohyponym, polysemy, and appeal. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court of Minnesota found a similar juxtaposition potentially defamatory in Phipps v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
.'" That can be enjoined, held today's opinion by Judge Herbert Phipps, joined by Chief Judge Brian Rickman and Judge Christopher McFadden, in Wood v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:15 am by mtlawlibrary
State DA 20-0132 2021 MT 153N Civil – Postconviction Phipps v. [read post]