Search for: "Pitts v. Black"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 28, 2024Before: Singh, J.P., Kennedy, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Michael, JJ. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 28, 2024Before: Singh, J.P., Kennedy, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Michael, JJ. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
From Mumma v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:40 am
The defendant was convicted at trial of indecent liberties with a minor in Pitt County. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
Third, the Managers do not care what Senator Jacob Howard, Senator William Pitt Fessenden, or anyone else said during Johnson's Senate impeachment trial. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
FDA Licensure Process and U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The Government offers no meaningful distinction between this case and Pitt News. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm
Pitts, each of which loosened the standard for ending court supervision of formerly de jure segregated school districts. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Initially two black males entered the store, and they were later joined by a third black male. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
There has been some discussion regarding the merits of the decision of the English Court of Appeal in the case of Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 over the last 20 years (see, for example, paragraphs 5.15 & 13.12 of Munkman on Employer’s Liability, 16th Edition). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Pitt. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Pitts, supra). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:20 am
., Pitts v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
These items were taken without Anita Pitts['] consent. [read post]
