Search for: "Powell v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman echoed conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas’s call to overrule Times v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
In Coker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 9:32 am
Reeves v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
Thomas Powell once famously said, “If you think that you can think about a thing, inextricably attached to something else, without thinking of the thing it is attached to, then you have a legal mind. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
At the very end of last week’s oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
Powell and Hertz Corp. v Friend, and it heard oral argument in Holder v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:40 pm
On February 26, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Clapper v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:40 pm
On February 26, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Clapper v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
The WCCA in Powell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:33 pm
Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:08 pm
" Later Powell observed that Skinner v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
However, said the court, in any event Supreme Court addressed the merits of Thomas’ amended petition.** See Powell v Board of Educ. of Westbury Union Free School Dist., 91 AD3d 955, summarized at http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2012/02/where-arbitration-is-statutorily.htmlThe decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_01928.htm______________________ The Discipline Book - A 458 page guide focusing on New York… [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The Minnesota Twin, Harry Blackmun, who would write Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:53 pm
Marks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
All too often, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:51 pm
Garner et al., The Law of Judicial Precedent § 4, at 44 (2016); accord Powell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 2:35 pm
Dolan & Helen V. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:36 pm
Part V draws on the contemporaneous analysis of Professor Thomas Reed Powell to isolate the core principle emerging from the Child Labor Tax Case and its progeny: that a nominal tax is in fact a regulatory penalty where it imposes an exaction triggered by departure from a detailed and specified course of conduct, and the exaction is sufficiently onerous to induce those engaged in the targeted conduct generally to alter their behavior. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:09 pm
Justice Goepel of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, in Bronson v. [read post]
