Search for: "Prewitt v. Prewitt" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
” The employee’s retaliation claim, supported only by a “conspiracy theory” argument of pretext, also could not survive (Prewitt v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:46 am by Patrick Quinlan
The question most often asked by the national media was whether the Romney-Ryan ticket, while wishing to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 2nd Circuit Rejects Key Litigation Hold Standard - http://bit.ly/NFI9EM (John Jablonski) A Quick Forensics Lesson: The Smart Phone Is Much More than Just a Hard Drive - http://bit.ly/Q1N9tR (Greg Buckles) An Uncertain Standard for Cost Shifting Can Restore a Level Playing Field - http://bit.ly/NgYZxk (Matthew Prewitt) Are Seed Sets the New Keyword? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:32 am by Steven Boutwell
Meanwhile, in the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal (based in Lake Charles), the appellate court reached a different conclusion in the case, Prewitt v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The best statement of the rule is that a wrong-doer is responsible for the natural and proximate consequences of his [or her] misconduct' " (Battalla v State of New York, 10 NY2d 237, 240; see Derby v Prewitt, 12 NY2d 100, 105-106). [read post]