Search for: "Price v. Nicholson" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2019, 7:35 am by John McFarland
Nicholson, No. 17-0509, once again addressing the duty of the holder of executive rights to minerals owned by another. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 5:36 pm
Justice Nicholson, in the Federal Court, Perth declared that a number of companies in the commercial air conditioning and mechanical services industry had engaged in illegal bid-rigging and price-fixing cartels in breach of the Trade Practices Act 1974. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:23 am by Dennis Crouch
This is the second guest post coming from Michigan Law Professor Nicholson Price‘s seminar merging science fiction and legal analysis. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
Nicholson Subscription Required NASSAU COUNTYBankruptcy "Bankruptcy Court Previously Conferred Standing On Plaintiffs to Commence Suit on Notes" Day v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
  In an excellent article by Professor Nicholson Price and Arti Rai titled, "Manufacturing Barriers to Biologics Competition and Innovation," the authors discuss the importance of trade secrecy to the manufacturing of biologics and how trade secrecy raises the price of biosimilars (almost like generics). [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
Both Nicholson Price and Guy Pessach explore this complication in their papers for this symposium. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nicholson Price: Utility patent imperialism: why aren’t they patents if they say patents on them. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm by Dmitry Karshtedt
A recent article by Nicholson Price and Arti Rai (behind paywall) explains that “at least for complex biologics, the predominant view of the scientific community, shared by the FDA, is that fundamental knowledge has not advanced to the point where product characteristics can fully be identified and characterized through analysis of the final product. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]