Search for: "Prior v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 48,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
KATHY DEASY, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
In its briefing, the patentee argued that FilmTec is a an improper federalization of state law and, in fact, is contrary to prior state case law that did not create an “automatic assignment” of inventions that were not yet foretold at the time of the employment contract. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]llegations that a defendant had actual knowledge of prior acts by an employee similar to those alleged in the complaint satisfy the notice element" (Moore Charitable Found. v PJT Partners, Inc., 40 NY3d at 158). [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]llegations that a defendant had actual knowledge of prior acts by an employee similar to those alleged in the complaint satisfy the notice element" (Moore Charitable Found. v PJT Partners, Inc., 40 NY3d at 158). [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Group 48, LP v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
The state courts upheld this mandate as a neutral law under Employment Division v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:21 pm
See Mata v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:21 pm
See Mata v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 12:21 pm
See Mata v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:45 am
LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:23 pm
The court distinguished the facts from its prior decision in PPG Industries v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:22 am
Colorado 23-831Issues: (1) Whether a prior misdemeanor conviction that elevates a subsequent offense from a misdemeanor to a felony is an element of the subsequent offense that must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt under Apprendi v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:59 am
OCR noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ** Civil Service Law §72 applies to public employees in the Classified Service of the State as the employer or a political subdivision of the State [see Civil Service §40]. [read post]
