Search for: "Priorities USA v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
It is the policy of my Administration to advance and govern the development and use of AI in accordance with eight guiding principles and priorities. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
I am a law professor whose first priorities are my students and my law school. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Chair Rodgers also noted the retreat from imposing undue burdens, stating that it removed guardrails essential to good governance. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 12:29 am
Some conclusions are drawn in Part V. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:40 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
Skinny Label Infringement in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
In Ileto v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:54 am
See Steven Westlake v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
Electric Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
(Please note that these figures reflect only federal court securities class action lawsuit filings; the filing numbers do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings during the year.) [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
Brittex, not Dollar, was the first to use that mark in connection with pawn brokerage and pawn shop services, said the court, and the Board provided no support for the notion that a registrant has priority as to a specific service it was second to offer just because it was first to offer a different specific service (Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
” The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Ga.)); Bring a complaint in California federal court along with Attorneys General from six states (claims made by five states based on pendent jurisdiction dismissed in FTC v. v. [read post]
