Search for: "Quinn v. JUDICIAL CONDUCT"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 4:45 pm
Background Mannok Holdings, formerly Quinn Industrial Holdings, wrote to the LSNI in April 2021 to complain about the Plaintiff’s professional conduct, specifically his alleged contact with Mannok’s shareholders and subsequent involvement with a local community group protesting against its business activities. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
Appellate Court Case Not Originating with Appeals Board Quinn v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:14 am
Quinn). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:37 pm
Cinerama, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:13 pm
Moreover, petitioner's position that resignation and a promise not to seek future office clears the slate would encourage Judges to disregard the high standards of conduct they are bound to observe and "avoid the consequences of removal for cause by racing to resign"-- a practice rejected by this Court (Matter of Quinn v State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 54 NY2d 386, 395). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
Those allegations eventually resulted in the Commission's December 2020 admonition of Eckhardt "for engaging in willful conduct that cast public discredit upon the judiciary in violation of Article V, Section 1-a(6) of the Texas Constitution. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 7:31 am
Michaels v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Quinn, the Second Circuit allowed a good-faith defense to a section 1983 claim for reimbursement of agency fees paid prior to decision. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:42 am
-Austin 2004, pet. denied); Quinn v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Quinn. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
As a result, the case does not directly address the question now presented—whether a legislature’s prescribed timeline can be judicially overridden.Perhaps the most directly relevant case is Valenti v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Interestingly, the Appeals Court cited the Rules and provided the URL where they are available, but did not expressly take judicial notice of them. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
” Quinn v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 6:50 am
Raymond Nimrod of Quinn Emmanuel argued for the Broad Institute. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 5:08 am
In Quinn v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am
Oppressive conduct is evaluated in most states under one of three judicially-created formulations: majority conduct that defeats the reasonable expectations of the minority shareholder; breach of the fiduciary duty of good faith and fair dealing majority shareholders owe minority shareholders; and burdensome, harsh, and wrongful conduct constituting a visible departure from the standards of fair dealing majority shareholders owe minority… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am
Oppressive conduct is evaluated in most states under one of three judicially-created formulations: majority conduct that defeats the reasonable expectations of the minority shareholder; breach of the fiduciary duty of good faith and fair dealing majority shareholders owe minority shareholders; and burdensome, harsh, and wrongful conduct constituting a visible departure from the standards of fair dealing majority shareholders owe minority… [read post]
