Search for: "REED v. THOMAS" Results 1 - 20 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Colucci v Rzepka 2024 NY Slip Op 01232 Decided on March 7, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department is Plaintiff’s last try to avoid dismissal. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:16 am by Ellena Erskine
The justices will then hear oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by David Pocklington
The items included: replacement of the pews with chairs; replacement of the stone font with a moveable wooden font; removal of the main reed organ [an early 20th century harmonium]; creation of a lobby at the west end of the church, and kitchen, toilet and storage facilities; electrical wiring and light fittings; and water and space heating [3, 4]. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
United States Patrick Reed’s $750m (£618m) defamation lawsuits against golf reporters and media outlets has been dismissed by a federal judge in Florida. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
What I want to highlight is Reed’s use of terms like “friction,” “restriction,” and “cost” to describe how COPPA affects the behavior of parents, children, and social-media platforms. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
 The story of how the Court upheld a mandatory pledge salute for school children in Minersville School District v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The Tenth Circuit held that, whether viewed as compelled speech or as a content-based restriction, the restriction had to – and did – satisfy strict scrutiny: Colorado could show that it has a compelling interest, and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to satisfy that interest (Reed v Town of Gilbert 576 US 155, 164 (2015)). [read post]