Search for: "RICHARD J CAMPBELL"
Results 1 - 20
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Richard M. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Fuerst & Robert J. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The Evolution of FTC Antitrust Enforcement – Highlights of Its Origins and Major Trends 1910-1914 – Creation and Launch The election of 1912, which led to the creation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), occurred at the apex of the Progressive Era. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Campuzano Díaz, Beatriz “The participation of the European Union in the… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
In Hanahoe (much as in Richard v BBC) the Gardaí leaked to the media that they would carry out a search at the offices of a prominent firm of solicitors. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
The majority opinion in Warhol purports to follow the Campbell framework, but instead it reinterprets Campbell in ways that destabilize that three-decade consensus, likely resulting in a decade or more of renewed battle over the contours of the fair-use doctrine. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
Richards LJ found that these elements were unable to be separated. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
In 2022 we covered two high profile libel trials, both heard by Steyn J. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
United States (1919) (majority and dissent of Holmes, J.) [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Ct. 2448, 2464 (2018) (citing A Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom, in 2 Papers of Thomas Jefferson 545 (J. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:00 am
High Court’s decision In the High Court, Kelyn Bacon KC (now Bacon J) was persuaded by B’s counsel. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
But again, since in practice in speech-based cases an applicant is already required by s.12(2) HRA to demonstrate exceptional reasons why the respondent should not be notified before the court exceptionally grants an injunction or similar relief against someone who has not been notified of the application – see the Master of the Rolls’ Practice Guidance: Interim Non-Disclosure Orders [2012] 1 WLR 1003, at paras.5 and 18-23, and Birmingham City Council v Afsar [2019] ELR 373 (Warby… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
Simmerman, Ryan J. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Judge Jennifer Campbell said there is no evidence that lawmakers ever intended to exempt themselves when they approved the laws. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm
The Court of Appeal confirmed that the substantive and procedural law that applies to this particular case was clear, and was correctly applied by Lieven J, and they did not consider it necessary to provide any further guidance. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace. [read post]
