Search for: "ROEMER v. ROEMER"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 5:48 am
Neoshia Roemer has posted her work-in-progress, Equity for American Indian Families, on SSRN. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The NLRB cited as an example of conduct that is protected:A good example is the Eighth Circuit’s picket-line misconduct decision in Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:37 pm
According the the California Supreme Court, “Actionable negligence consists of two elements: (1) duty; and (2) breach of that duty by failure to exercise reasonable care” (Roemer v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:37 pm
According the the California Supreme Court, “Actionable negligence consists of two elements: (1) duty; and (2) breach of that duty by failure to exercise reasonable care” (Roemer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:49 am
Roemer—Reading American Indian Law [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:45 am
In her forthcoming article, The Indian Child Welfare Act as Reproductive Justice, Professor Neoshia Roemer considers the impact of Dobbs alongside the potential gutting of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) in Brackeen v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:05 am
Neoshia Roemer published a robust summary of the upcoming Haaland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 3:52 am
Neoshia Roemer has posted “The Indian Child Welfare Act as Reproductive Justice,” forthcoming in the Boston University Law Review, on SSRN. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:33 pm
BY JOHN ROEMER *** Just days after the Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:12 am
Cathedral Academy, 434 U.S. 125, 134-135 (1977) (White, J., dissenting); Roemer v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Roemer Wallens Gold & Mineaux LLP, Albany(Benjamin D. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Roemer Wallens Gold & Mineaux LLP, Albany(Benjamin D. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Rodgers v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:42 am
Cohen's "Marxist Boxing Match: Roemer v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991), where the Court held that section 2 of the Voting Rights Act covers judicial elections. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am
Roemer, 501 U.S. 380 (1991), where the Court held that section 2 of the Voting Rights Act covers judicial elections. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:00 am
" College X appealed the Supreme Court's ruling but only for the purposed of vindicating itself with respect to that part of the Supreme Court's decision that stated that College X had violated Student B's constitutional rights.The Appellate Division, noting that College X did not challenge Supreme Court's holding that its decision was arbitrary and capricious, concluded College X's appeal sought only to vacate that part of the Supreme Court's decision finding that… [read post]
