Search for: "Railroad Commission of Texas v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
United States, the states ask the justices to grant review and reverse the 6th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Fifth, there is a state action overlay when it comes to Big Tech censorship (see Missouri v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission issued new Draft Merger Guidelines. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:26 pm
Importantly, before an operator can drill on pooled tracts, the Texas Railroad Commission (the “Commission”) must determine whether the operator has both a valid lease and pooling authority. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
The law “subjects to the practically uncontrolled discretion of the Commission every issue or general sale of stocks, bonds, or securities hereafter to be made in Michigan. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm
Railroad Commission of Texas and EOG Resources, an appeal from the Commission’s denial of sixteen applications by Ammonite under the Mineral Interest Pooling Act. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:54 am
The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
Township of Scott (2019), the the Supreme Court reversed Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
An option would be to provide for greater state agency involvement with authority to review settlements. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Pt. 5 12/10/21 21-588 (21A85) United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Pt. 5 12/10/21 21-588 (21A85) United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:13 am
Railroad Commission of Texas illustrates the difficulties faced by lessees attempting to force-pool a tract under the Mineral Interest Pooling Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm
There Is No Federal Drug Testing Law for Private Employers in the United StatesCheck Your State - and Check With Counsel! [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:43 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker In Hlavinka v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Indeed, this was the approach that the CSX Railroad took in seeking redress from fraudfeasor radiologist Dr. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
United States Postal Service. [read post]
