Search for: "Rather v CBS Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On Jan. 16, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
The Government must evaluate reasonableness based on the particular contractor’s operations, rather than a “universal, objective determination of what the cost would have been to other contractors at large. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am by Norman L. Eisen
CBS Corp., 701 F.3d 1176 (7th Cir. 2012) (citing Acker, upholding removal because “the gravamen of the claim” occurred while the defendant was acting under color of federal authority); Castillo v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rather, they tout their general reliability, and simply acknowledge the risk of error. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
David Lametti, as he then was, before he became a Member of Parliament and then Minister of Justice, were my colleagues, co-counsel and clients in an intervention in the immediate forerunner to the current SCC decision, namely, the case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 5:07 pm by Bona Law PC
By 2011, 90% of American media was controlled by just six companies (GE, News-Corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS). [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
Opinion Editor’s note: Each Spring, attorneys Bill Marler and Denis Stearns teach a Food Safety Litigation course in the LL.M. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, In re Dan Farr Prods., 874 F.3d 590, 596 n.8 (9th Cir. 2017), noted that "'[s]ubsequent civil or criminal proceedings, rather than prior restraints, ordinarily are the appropriate sanction for calculated defamation or other misdeeds in the First Amendment context'" (quoting CBS, Inc. v. [read post]