Search for: "Ray v. Ward*"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) Harlow v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Ray Bell Construction Co., 2008 WL 544563 (Tenn. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
[An interesting threats case, from the Louisiana Court of Appeal] From Terrell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Anderson talk about the case of Trump v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:15 pm
Price v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
Dunn v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
See Gomez v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Cimino v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
McGuire testified before Congress: There is still no evidence that we hold that a firearm intrinsically capable of passing undetected through conventional x-ray and metal detector systems exists or is feasible under any current technology immediately available to us. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:15 pm
Using “Part I, Section A, Subsection 1” to organize a brief may work in a paper document when the judge can discern that an “A” probably corresponds to “Part I” rather than “Part V. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:15 pm
Using “Part I, Section A, Subsection 1” to organize a brief may work in a paper document when the judge can discern that an “A” probably corresponds to “Part I” rather than “Part V. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Additional Resources: Pasquale v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Additional Resources: Pasquale v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Frank V. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
The opinion is long (over 9,000 words), and walks through each of Ray Dansby’s claims for relief, which are highly fact-specific. [read post]
