Search for: "Reynolds v. S & D FOODS, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2022, 5:31 pm by Francis Pileggi
Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights recently ruled that Zhongpin Inc. shareholders have no standing to sue the food processors’ D&O insurer directly to collect a $41.3 million default judgement they won in their underlying Chancery Court challenge to Zhongpin’s allegedly unfairly-priced buyout in Rodriguez, et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 3:13 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently decided Zhongpin Inc. shareholders’ battle to force the food processor’s director and officer insurer to pay the $41.3 million Chancery Court judgment they won by challenging an unfairly-priced buyout must be fought in the Delaware Superior Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Hinckley, 550 F.3d 926 (10th Cir. 2008) abrogated by Reynolds v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm by Bexis
Naas Foods, Inc., 959 F.2d 69, 71-72 (7th Cir. 1992). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]