Search for: "Robert Davies v." Results 1 - 20 of 1,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 5:59 am by Nikhel Sus
(And surely the Union states that ratified the Fourteenth Amendment would have been shocked to learn they were powerless to stop disqualified Confederate leaders like Jefferson Davis and Robert E. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Purcell, New York Law School, looks back to Charles Evans Hughes's Supreme Court of the United States for inspiration on how Chief Justices can induce the resignations of Associate Justices  (The Hill).Barbara Lauriat, Texas Tech University School of Law, has published Robinson & Roberts v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Adam Dodek
Other tributes noted his participation in the landmark case of Halpern v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 10 April 2024 there were hearings in the cases of Jones Nickolds ltd v Ian Robert Pearce KB-2024-000886 and Specialty Coffee Association Ltd v Elizabeth Odushola KB-2023-002556. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Newspaper Journalism and regulation IPSO Resolution Statement – 00019-24 Peach v dorset.live, 7 children in sex cases (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 00032-24 Hudson v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 20825-23 Revell v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
[5] Commission Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change, Release No. 33-9106 (Feb. 2, 2010) [75 FR 6290 (Feb. 8, 2010)] [6] See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
It appears to us that Roberts assigned himself the Court's per curiam opinion in Trump v. [read post]