Search for: "Robert Jackson, Jr." Results 1 - 20 of 767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:49 am by Marcia Coyle
In upholding the federal law, the majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., did two important things. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Jackson did not join the per curiam opinion (an opinion, we have argued, that is open to serious historical and analytic challenge), but they nonetheless agreed with the bottom line (again, a bottom line that we find flawed) that Colorado lacked power to exclude Trump from the ballot. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 7:01 am by Howard Bashman
Roberts, Jr. and Justice Thomas each filed a concurring opinion. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am by Marcia Coyle
Wade in 2022, and before that in 2021, she joined the conservative majority (Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., dissenting, as did three liberals) in refusing to temporarily halt Texas’s six-week abortion ban. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Jackson, Jr., a professor of law at NYU School of Law who served as a commissioner of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Martin Luther King Jr. on the principles of nonviolence or organize the March on Washington? [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Jackson, Jr., a professor of law at NYU School of Law who served as a commissioner of the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
With a List of Suggested Resources**On June 4, 2020 the Washington Supreme Court issued an open letter to the judiciary and legal community recognizing deep-seated and continuing institutional racial injustice and calling for action to address systemic inequities. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
Jackson, Jr.; The Untenable Case for Keeping Investors in the Dark (discussed on the Forum here) by Lucian A. [read post]