Search for: "Robins v. Spokeo, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 3:24 am
"Such a monetary injury is undoubtedly 'concrete.' Indeed, the Supreme Court has long recognized that 'traditional tangible harms,' such as monetary harms, 'readily qualify as concrete injuries under Article III.'" TransUnion LLC, 594 U.S. at 425; see Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“Evenflo, supported by its amici, argues that this body of precedent recognizing overpayment injuries is in tension with the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Spokeo v. [read post]
At the summary judgment stage, the law firm argued that Perez did not have standing to sue because she had not suffered a concrete injury-in-fact under the Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
In 2016, a month after Schumacher and SC Data agreed to settle, the US Supreme Court issued a decision dismissing an FCRA claim for lack of standing in Spokeo, Inc. v Robins since the plaintiff did not suffer a “concrete injury,” which led to SC Data moving to dismiss the class action on similar grounds. [read post]