Search for: "Roos v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 9:07 am
<> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
Who've decided to use eminent domain to take the water assets of Golden State and to pay for it with Mello-Roos bonds.The Court of Appeal is fine with that. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:50 am
[opinion], finding that the states of Veracruz, Tamaulipas and Quintana Roo cannot bring a lawsuit against BP because Mexico's federal government owns the affected property. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:16 am
Roos v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:15 pm
The first, Golden State Water Company v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:21 pm
You'll recall that when the new, broader standard for government takings came down in Kelo v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
As noted above, the United States holds a new, unilateral and incorrect interpretation of the USMCA automotive ROO, which it presently effectuates through measures such as the ASR Approval Letters. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 10:51 am
In Azusa Land Partners v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Roos & Anita Mackay, A Shift in the United Nations Human Rights Committee's Jurisprudence on Marriage Equality? [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 12:40 pm
A-Roo Co., 222 F.3d 1372, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm
A-Roo Co., 222 F.3d 1372, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:07 am
The order from 26 April 2024 in AIM Sport Development AG v Supponor (UPC CoA 500/2023) demonstrated gold-medal deadline flexibility. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
A-Roo Co., 222 F.3d 1372, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:09 pm
However, several key challenges remain for the next decade, including sustainability, biodiversity, and food security.PatentsGuest UPCKats, Agathe Michel-de Cazotte, Hiske Roos, and Laura Mikkelsen (Carpmaels) examined the UPC Court of Appeal’s decision on the VusionGroup v Hanshow litigation (UPC_CoA_1/2024). [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:13 am
Any other measure which hinders access of products originating in other member States to the market of a member State is also covered by that concept (Case C-110/05 Commission v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 3:38 am
Our guest UPCKats, Hiske Roos and Laura Mikkelsen and members from the team at Carpmaels, are back to report on the 2 May 2024 decision in Mala Technologies v Nokia UPC_CFI-484/2023. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
[UPCKat] Revisiting lessons from the first ex parte UPC preliminary injunction in myStromer v Revolt
7 Aug 2024, 6:33 am
With our guest UPCKat team in the form of guest UPCKats Agathe Michel-de Cazotte, Hiske Roos and Laura Mikkelsen and members from the team at Carpmaels we continue the journey, again visiting the Düsseldorf Local Division last year in two decisions (22 June and 18 October) in Mystromer v. [read post]
