Search for: "Rose v State" Results 1 - 20 of 2,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2024, 2:53 pm by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Romania will become 18th member state in September. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:29 am by Eric Segall
Before we get to that, however, let's discuss corruption.In McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm by Max Weirauch
Partner Steve Cikes also has extensive appellate experience, helping to secure victories in cases involving vested rights (Rose v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm by Trane Robinson
  The proliferation of sports gambling in conjunction with this weekend’s run for the roses makes the Judge Cole’s opinion for Sixth Circuit in Mattera v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:34 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Emma v MEC for Health Gauteng Province (2022/12482) [2024] ZAGPJHC 276 (15 March 2024) (saflii.org) This blog was authored by Brigitte Geyer, candidate attorney, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:52 am by Zaid Majiet
This blog was co-authored by Sarah-Lee Seekoei, Candidate Attorney, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]