Search for: "SANDERS v. THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 59. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Simply stated, Civil Investigative Demands used in False Claims Act investigations are essentially subpoenas authorized under 31 U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
Cuomo, & c., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
Cuomo, & c., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Although some causal claims may be supported by strong evidence of a biological process with mechanistic evidence, such claims are not common in United States tort litigation. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
”[28] V. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:19 am
Facts: This case (Rodell Sanders v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
Sanders, Stuart Smalley, Tim Harken, Chuckie Schumer, et al. be so angry about it? [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
