Search for: "SAY MEDIA GROUP LTD." Results 1 - 20 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
The Media Law Podcast has more information. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia A group of Australian federal police officers have launched a defamation case against the ACT government in relation to Shane Drumgold’s complaint about their handling of the Bruce Lehrmann prosecution. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
There have been no media law hearings for the past fortnight. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
 And as for the policy and guidance itself—as the saying goes, the devil is the details, and implementing this policy could create far greater problems than those it purports to solve (to extent single judge division even pose any problems). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 1 February 2024, judgment was handed down in Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd [2024] EWHC 173 (KB). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Reports from the media followed, highlighting a litany of questionable deals coming from the Capitol. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
” For both groups of Plaintiffs, SB 419 implicates traditional First Amendment speech. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
The Judge went on to say that Article 10 “protects both speech by an identified individual and anonymous speech. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
There was also a hearing in the case of Price v Newsquest Media Group. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Human rights groups in Israel have said it is tantamount to thought policing. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
What does section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 say and how can the test be met? [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The groups say the European Commission and the Council of the European Union do not enforce their own export laws and need to limit the sale of such technology until more stringent regulations are in place. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
For example, in Green Corns Ltd v Claverley Group Ltd [2005] EWHC 958 (QB) (18 May 2005) [h/t Andrew Scott] Tugendhat J granted an injunction restraining a local newspaper from publishing the addresses of homes provided for troubled children. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:33 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘This case involves a major law firm switching sides against former clients’ to represent an alleged monopolist, attorneys for Yelp and the media group told U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913, 930 (2005) (“One infringes contributorily by intentionally inducing or encouraging direct infringement, and infringes vicariously by profiting from direct infringement while declining to exercise a right to stop or limit it. [read post]