Search for: "SOTOMAYOR"
Results 1 - 20
of 12,248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2024, 7:15 pm
“Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Talks Justice, Civic Engagement at Radcliffe Day”: Matan H. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:05 am
“Justice Sotomayor Describes Frustration With Being a Liberal on the Supreme Court; In a conversation at Harvard, the justice spoke of her despair at some of the court’s decisions, but she urged optimism and a focus on future generations”: Abbie VanSickle of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
25 May 2024, 7:19 am
The New York Times reports on recent remarks by Justice Sonia Sotomayor at Harvard University's Radcliffe Institute. [read post]
25 May 2024, 4:49 am
Said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, quoted in "Justice Sotomayor Describes Frustration With Being a Liberal on the Supreme Court/In a conversation at Harvard, the justice spoke of her despair at some of the court’s decisions, but she urged optimism and a focus on future generations" (NYT). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
[This piece is cross-posted and was originally published in the Yale J. on Reg.: Notice & Comment blog] Administrative law is almost certain to undergo monumental change during the Supreme Court’s current Term. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
Joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Elena Kagan dissented from the court’s decision. [read post]
23 May 2024, 7:03 am
And Justice Elena Kagan issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Jackson joined. [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:30 am
Justice Sotomayor focused on the detailed findings of the trial courts. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
” An alarmed Justice Sotomayor waved a warning flag, writing in a concurrence that Alito’s opinion “strongly hint[ed]” that he intended to jettison Abood. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:03 am
Justice Sotomayor writes that the language of the FAA, the structure of the statute, and the purpose of the statute all point in the same direction:When a federal court finds that a dispute is subject to arbitration, and a party has requested a stay of the court proceeding pending arbitration, the court does not have discretion to dismiss the suit on the basis that all claims are subject to arbitration.While the Court thinks is not a complicated issue, the lower federal courts were in… [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:32 pm
Notice How This Never Happens To Sotomayor And The Yankees: Phillies fans are done with upside-down flag fan ruining their league leading season. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Administrative law is almost certain to undergo monumental change during the Supreme Court’s current Term. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:17 pm
In delivering the opinion of the Court, Justice Sotomayor noted the “text, structure and purpose” of the FAA “all pointed to the same conclusion: When a federal court finds that a dispute is subject to arbitration, and a party has requested a stay of the court proceeding pending arbitration, the court does not have discretion to dismiss the suit on the basis that all the claims are subject to arbitration. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
Justice Kagan wrote a concurrence joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, that found support for the CFPB's funding structure in post-enactment practice. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:23 am
Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
A second concurrence--by Justice Kagan joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett--is a bit more puzzling. [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:45 pm
Justice Sotomayor, writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, stated that Section 3 “creates an obligation impervious to judicial discretion. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:37 pm
Sotomayor takes the position that the answer is obvious because the “text, structure, and purpose” of the Federal Arbitration Act “all point to the same conclusion. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:55 am
Although she joined the Thomas opinion for the court, Kagan also wrote separately – in a five-page opinion joined by Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett – that looked at appropriations through a broader historical lens than the Thomas opinion. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:39 am
Why then did Justices Sotomayor and Kagan deny the application for a stay? [read post]
