Search for: "STATE v HAACK" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm by admin
The distinction between relied upon, and admissible, studies is codified in the Federal Rules of Evidence, and in virtually every state’s evidence law. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by admin
” [5]  Haack at 21. [6]  Haack at 22. [7]  Haack at 24, citing Blum v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by Schachtman
” [5]  Haack at 21. [6]  Haack at 22. [7]  Haack at 24, citing Blum v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:36 pm by Peter Tillers
 But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Susan Haack (University of Miami - School of Law) has posted Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: The Lessons of Buck v. [read post]