Search for: "STATE v. DINKINS"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:45 pm
From Dinkins v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Wiggins v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:31 am
In Miller v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 am
Dinkins, 84 NY2d 216 (1994). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:17 am
In Bishop v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am
Supreme Court denied the County's motion and confirmed the arbitrator’s decision against the County, sustaining the arbitrator's award of $27,049.20 against Nassau.The Appellate Division subsequently rejected the County’s appeal of the Supreme Court's ruling.The court said that an arbitration award violates public policy “only where a court can conclude, without engaging in any extended fact-finding or legal analysis, that a law prohibits the particular matters to be… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 2:30 pm
[Breaking Defense] * Lawyers per capita by state. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:52 am
Because the charge instructs the jury on the law applicable to the case, it must contain an accurate statement of the law and set out all essential elements of the offense, Dinkins v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:45 am
Forget Mapp v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:14 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court wisely rejected the state’s proposal earlier this week in State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Second, they could be forfeited under 19 USC 1497(a)(1) because there was no declaration of entry made on any customs form when imported into the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Rongiger sued then State Comptroller H. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:16 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
"Dinkins' primary contention, as we construe it, is that he could not be convicted of failing to provide his post-release address as required under Wis. [read post]