Search for: "STATE v. PUMA"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Apparently it was also brought forward during the meeting of the EPO’s Administrative Council late June by various member states. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am
The defendant was Puma, who had launched a clothing line in collaboration with their brand ambassador, Neymar. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 6:16 am
PUMA SE et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:40 am
Puma v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am
Puma has filed applications for its PUMA and Leaping Logos covering, among other things, “[d]ownloadable virtual goods, namely, computer programs featuring footwear, clothing, headwear, eyewear, bags, sports bags, backpacks, sports equipment, art, toys, and accessories for use online and in online virtual worlds” in Class 9 (see here and here).3. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case T-297/20) and taking unfair advantage of the reputation of a well-known mark (Asolo Ltd. v EUIPO | Case T-509/19) and the importance of presenting valid arguments for the existence of a link between the marks - even in the case of marks with an exceptional… [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
Puma Biotechnology, Inc. 21-577Issue: Whether, under Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:45 pm
Lawsuits discussed:San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v United States Olympic CommitteeUSOPC v Puma Watch the video of this episode on YouTube, here. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Sometimes elegance is refusal.The average consumer and the nature of the purchasing actAs per Sabel BV v Puma AG, the average consumer normally perceives a trade mark as a whole and does not proceed to analyse the various details. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:34 am
District Court case, Eshelman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:34 am
District Court case, Eshelman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
It also appears to be significantly difficult for applicants’ to invoke successfully violations of principles like those equal treatment and sound administration (see for example earlier post on EUIPO v Puma, C‑564/16 P, reported on this blog). [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:46 am
The photographer brought a claim against Hadid [Peter Cepeda v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:06 pm
In Noffsinger v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 5:54 am
Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) & Joined Cases Di Puma v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:11 am
The Connecticut opinion, Noffsinger v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:19 am
The case, Noffsinger v. [read post]
