Search for: "Samuels v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that ruling. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
The solicitor general now seeks review, supported by the District of Columbia and 20 states, which have filed a friend-of-the-court brief. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Justice Samuel Alito, the author of the Dobbs decision overruling Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
District Judge Curtis L. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:58 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
But if O’Connor proved disappointing to conservatives, they were delighted with her successor, Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Scott Perry by the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, which has heard litigation over special counsel Jack Smith’s effort to access the communications stored on Perry’s cell phone. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2008, the Court revived the long moribund Second Amendment, holding by a vote of 5-to-4 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:57 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia disagreed. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
The same day the federal district court ended the FDA’s approval, another judge in Washington State ordered the FDA to maintain the drug’s availability in 17 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
See, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm
Samuel Estreicher is the Dwight D. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
In Summers v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
The defendants had moved in limine to exclude Oreskes’ proferred historian testimony,[11] under the District of Columbia’s standard for admitting and excluding expert witness opinion testimony.[12] Oreskes’ opinion, at issue in the Mann case, was on the general basis for finding scientific research to be reliable, and that “think-tanks” (including the defendant CEI) “ignore, misrepresent, or reject” principled scientific thought on… [read post]
