Search for: "Schlup v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
However, as SCOTUS explained in Schlup v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit excused the default under the “actual innocence” exception recognized by Schlup v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:49 pm
Fontenot 21-970Issue: Whether “new” evidence, as referred to in Schlup v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:55 pm
The aftermath of one of the Supreme Court’s cases, Schlup v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:46 am
Consequently, as a result, the state court’s conclusion to the contrary, in denying the 440 motion, involved an “unreasonable application” of Strickland. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:25 am
Delo and House v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court Center.McQuiggin v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:42 am
In Trevino v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:51 am
Arguing for respondent Floyd Perkins, Chad Readler faced this question immediately in his argument; he suggested that the district court had misapplied the standard for assessing actual innocence under Schlup v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:23 am
More on Schlup, via Oyez. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
(Daniels v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
Surely there will be more as long as capital punishment remains part of our penal law.4 And so, in 1972, the United States joined other modern industrial nations in abolishing the death penalty. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Bell (2006), and Schlup v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm
Davis’ legal team contends that the standard that was applied – “clear and convincing evidence in light of both the old evidence and new evidence presented at the hearing” – had been rejected by the Court in an earlier case as too strict for an actual innocence claim (Schlup v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
Bell, (2006), and Schlup v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:03 am
Petitioner sought equitable tolling of a time-barred petition through an actual innocence claim, pursuant to Schlup v. [read post]
