Search for: "Sharif v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11191-21 Sharif v The Jewish Chronicle, 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 11103-22 A woman v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10895-22 Various v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 10780-22 Raeburn v southwalesguardian, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
Hacked Off reminds readers that the Leveson system is not “state approved”. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
On 9 November 2022 there were hearings in the cases of Sharif v Associated Newspapers Limited and LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 8:30 am by Russell Knight
“[F]raud will not be presumed in this State and must be proved by clear and convincing evidence” Hofmann v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge in Maryland this week followed through on a previous warning to sanction a lawyer best known for representing Rep. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On 5 February 2021 Nicklin J heard a trial of preliminary issue in the cases of Yousaf v Associated Newspapers Ltd and Sharif v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Hunton Andrews Kurt Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “EDPB Releases Statement on Restrictions on Data Subject Rights in Connection with the State of Emergency in Member States”. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 10:28 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The panel then stated that, to prevail, Sharif needed to allege that Prime and/or Walgreens either had or were dangerously likely to obtain monopoly power in a relevant market. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]