Search for: "Sharp v. Long et al" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Richard Hunt
Shannon Creek  et al, Case No. 4:23-cv-00325-O (N.D. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
But here's what you can do, and we promise it'll make you feel better: Pick a local agency—it could be a city council, a sheriff's office or state department of natural resources—and send them an email demanding their public record-request log, or any other record showing what requests they receive, how long it took them to respond, whether they turned over records, and how much they charged the requester for copies. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Our model advances the measurement of expected profitability by leveraging a deep-learning approach developed by Farrell et al. (2022). [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:20 am by Joseph L. Hyde
LaFave et al., Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 2.1(e) (6th ed. 2020). [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The ‘superiority’ of Facebook and Google et al in the online advertising market means that newspapers are competing for an increasingly smaller pot of advertising income. [read post]