Search for: "Sharps v. US Forest Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 10:16 am
They and other users of the Tunstall system have been put in danger by the Defendant’s excessive use of, and damage to the Tunstall system. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
On 13 December 2021 there was an application in the misuse of private information case of Global Processing Services (UK) v Yanpolsky before Collins Rice J. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
The test adopted by the Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition, which allows the use of a person’s identity “in news reporting, commentary, entertainment, works of fiction or nonfiction, or in advertising that is incidental to such uses,” but not “if they are used in advertising the user’s goods or services, or are placed on merchandise marketed by the user, or are used in connection with services rendered by the… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
McKinney School of Law, Christine Nero Coughlin, Wake Forest University – School of Law. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
”The Agent Orange litigation involved a class action brought against the manufacturers of an herbicide that had been used by tens of thousands of Americans to defoliate Vietnam’s forests and mangroves. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
Appʹx at 2336. ʺPre‐Existing Intellectual Propertyʺ is defined as ʺany trade secret, invention, work of authorship, mask work or protectable design that has already been conceived or developed by anyone other than MSEI before [Universal] renders any services under the Agreement.ʺ Id. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Sharp, 441 S.W.3d 448, 451 (Tex.App. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The words we use provide a filter through which we view and acknowledge legal concepts. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Below is a brief summary of issues before the Court last week: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Sharp a three-judge panel struck down a Delaware law requiring differential prevailing wages as violating the Commerce Clause. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
On 21 June there was a statement in open court in West v 24 Seven Fostering Services before HHJ Parkes QC. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:00 am
At its core, and in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:25 am
The process announced today uses forest residuals – the wood scraps that are left over from logging operations – providing a value creating recycling opportunity for waste wood that is traditionally left in the forest, potentially becoming a forest fire hazard. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:08 pm
Landlords v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:37 pm
Waltham have been here before – in Arfon Abdi v LB Waltham Forest. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm
US Forest Service. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
R. v. [read post]
