Search for: "Short Way Lines v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 10:39 am
Justice Samuel Alito penned a short concurring opinion in which he emphasized that the majority’s ruling reflected the only way to interpret the ban on machine guns. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
In my essay after the oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
Justice Jackson wrote a short, solo concurrence that preached judicial restraint, citing an unlikely troika: McCulloch v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
In short, the Roberts Court has acted lawlessly from the beginning.1. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
We didn’t get all the way there on January 6 but we will endeavor to get rid of it and replace it with this right here,” raising his fist. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Merrill v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The immunogenic mechanism had a few lines of potential support, with the most prominent at the time coming from the laboratories of Douglas Radford Shanklin, and his colleague, David L. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Corner Post v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
“If there is a single theme that threads its way throughout this volume, it is how the Court’s seemingly technical doctrines were fashioned in continuous dialogue with the popular preoccupations of its era” (xxv). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
This citation in Footnote 28 is significant in several ways. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
” But as an empirical matter, this is an overly short-term view of the social media marketplace. [read post]