Search for: "Shorts v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 22,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
It's short—18 pages! [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
The Facts The Supreme Court summarized the basic facts with admirable concision: This dispute had its start in a decades-old, short-lived music venture. [read post]
14 May 2024, 8:56 am
The post Sufficient to Allege: Short-circuiting Short-forms in State v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
State and Local Preemption. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
In short, a statute’ [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
In short supporting affidavits, each proposed intervening shareholder wrote: “I have a material interest in this lawsuit”; “I could be adversely affected by any judgment made in this lawsuit”; “I cannot afford an attorney”; and “I adopt the complaint as my complaint in this action. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
The standard of the experiments also fell short of what would have been required for a peer-reviewed publication. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
The sex, in her consistent telling, was bad, short, but not criminal. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
In short, private international law rules include choice of law rules (where a sales contract is governed by a CISG State’s law because of a choice of law clause) and conflict of laws rules (where, absent party choice of law, the forum’s rules indicate that a CISG State’s law is to apply). [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:52 pm
” UC President Michael V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm
Simplot Co. v. [read post]
