Search for: "Simmons v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2022, 9:25 am
Gist-Davis Slip op. at 9. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:34 pm
The District Judge added the Simmons v Castle 10% uplift to the disrepair general damages. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Self-service kiosks under fire Davis v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
Simmons report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
See also Roper v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
During oral argument in 2015 in Davis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
Parker The post Episode 005: CAVC Oral Argument: Simmons v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:21 am
Davis, noted briefly by Kent here. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:19 am
Simmons, "Patent Citations: Source of Insight or Nothing to Get Excited About? [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:31 am
From Comcast v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
While police were executing the search warrant, Melvin Simmons and Britney Davis—Edwards's former roommate and his roommate's girlfriend—independently brought a suitcase purportedly belonging to Edwards to drop off at the house. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
Simmons testified that `the pattern is consistent with animal bites. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
"Simmons v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm
Davis, 2016 U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
Simmons, reviewing Making Human Rights a Reality, by Emilie M. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 7:37 am
Mary writes: "Simmons & Simmons hosted a lively evening of debate about the Patents County Court decision in the Red Bus case, Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas [2012] EWPCC 1, 12 January 2012, and had the coup of having the opposing counsel in the room (well, in the Simmons’ dining room). [read post]
