Search for: "Small v. General Motors Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Small Business Administration’s Small Business Size Regulations or (ii) meet one of 16 different sets of criteria in the proposed regulation. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Presently, the statute providing that a corporation’s registration to do business in Pennsylvania thereby subjects that corporation to Pennsylvania state court jurisdiction over personal injury lawsuits remains valid but subject to continuing attacks.Test for Proper Venue RevisedJust last month the Pennsylvania Supreme Court continued its penchant for changing the law in a plaintiff-friendly way by revising the test for determining proper venue by rejecting the… [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
They would require that firms doing business in the state (with some exceptions) make climate disclosures similar to those under the expected SEC regulation and in some important ways would go further.[3] California has long led the nation in adoption of environmental rules, including the first motor vehicle emission standards in 1966, energy efficiency standards for appliances in the 1970s, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, and many others.[4] The new corporate climate… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
That framing recapitulates a key point in Gorsuch’s concurrence in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:01 am by Fauzan Siddiqui
As a general rule, every person (individual or corporation) has the right to commence a civil proceeding against another individual or government. [read post]
An AMT liability generally arises where the tentative minimum tax exceeds the sum of the corporation’s regular tax liability plus the corporation’s base erosion and anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”) imposed under Section 59A. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
On the matter of claim proliferation, the Court’s concern for the prospect of mass claims would seem inapplicable where the penalties might be sought for only a small, tightly knit group of co-workers; but that possibility is not entertained. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm by Alden Abbott
The prospect that those initiatives will yield binding rules that survive legal scrutiny is, however, vanishingly small. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm by Patricia Hughes
Saskatchewan (“Rothmans“) and Quebec (Attorney General) v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:05 am by Dan Bressler
General Motors Corp.: the relationship between the attorney and the former client, the time between the cases, the size of the firm, the nature of the disqualified attorney’s involvement in the case and the timing of the ‘wall.'” [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s like saying that, because Ford Motor Co. has published corporate histories in its name, sponsors Masterpiece Theater, and creates extensive social media content, “Ford Motor Company” is now a title for Rogers purposes, or that the existence of The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History or The Code: An Authorized History of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codemakes those entities into titles for Rogers purposes. [read post]