Search for: "Smith v. McConnell"
Results 1 - 20
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
In 1997, in Boerne v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal To Help 2024 Voters, Meta Says It Will Begin Labeling Political Ads That Use AI-Generated Imagery ABC News – David Klepper (Associated Press) | Published: 11/8/2023 Facebook and Instagram will require political ads running on their platforms to disclose if they were created using artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
From Smith v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:02 am
In an alternate reality, Justice Garland would be on the Supreme Court, Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Smith’s book contains valuable information, but it has many flaws and badly needs updating. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
It also includes the writings of such originalist scholars as well as Nathaniel Chapman, John Harrison, Kurt Lash, Michael McConnell, Ryan Williams, and Ilan Wurman. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Janus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
But you should ask yourself, and your students, how that principle stands along the Court's decision in Barbra Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Michael McConnell is right that this language had "one function only: to enable the Court to reach the conclusion it desired in Smith without openly overruling any prior decisions. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
He credits them (specifically, Michael McConnell) with having changed his mind about a number of important legal issues, in particular, the constitutionality of vouchers (used for religious school tuition), which he came to regard as not unconstitutional or as nonjusticiable—that is, an issue for the legislatures, not the courts, to decide. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm
(Our analysis builds on the excellent work in the last few days by (among others) Matthew Seligman (see here, here, here, and here); Protect Democracy; Andy Craig; Derek Muller; Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Brad Smith, and Rick Pildes; and Henry Olsen. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:11 pm
Indeed, in Doe v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
