Search for: "Smith v. National Union Ins. Co." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Whether the exclusionary policy rests on the alleged undesirable propensities of those of a particular race, nationality, occupation, political affiliation, or age, in this context the Unruh Act protects individuals from such arbitrary discrimination.[14] An earlier decision likewise stated that, under the Unruh Act, a shopping center couldn't exclude prospective customers "who wear long hair or unconventional dress, who are black, who are members of the John Birch Society, or who… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff therefore assumed the risk that the stock price would plummet without notice (see National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff therefore assumed the risk that the stock price would plummet without notice (see National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
Royal Drug Co.[6] and Union Labor Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
Co. of Am., 972 S.W. 2d 738, 740–41 (Tex. 1998); National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
They should set up shop here, and hire our workers, and pay decent wages, and invest in the future of this nation. [read post]