Search for: "Smith v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]n arbitrator 'exceed[s] [their] power' under the meaning of the statute where [their] 'award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power' " (id.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017],… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
"[A]n arbitrator 'exceed[s] [their] power' under the meaning of the statute where [their] 'award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power' " (id.), or where the arbitrator " 'manifestly disregard[s]' the substantive law applicable to the parties' dispute" (Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc., 155 AD3d 122, 127 [4th Dept 2017],… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
562, Decision No. 14,311; Appeal of Smith, Jr., 34 id. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
562, Decision No. 14,311; Appeal of Smith, Jr., 34 id. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
LEXIS 450 (3d Dept. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
See Grant v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
In a previous post, I wrote about the attempt by Merrick Garland's Justice Department in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
" Contemporary debates about originalism sometimes use the label, "the New Originalism" to distinguish the current emphasis on "original public meaning" from older forms of originalism that emphasized "original intentions. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Justice Dept. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am
” “The Court explained: “Plaintiff seeks disgorgement of legal fees on the ground that L’Abbate purportedly operated under a conflict of interest, was incompetent, and was disloyal, citing to Baugher v Cullen and Dykman, LLP (173 AD3d 959, 961, 103 N.Y.S.3d 136 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Nebraska (22-506) and Dept. of Education v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Appeals Court: Justice Dept. can use Mar-a-Lago documents in criminal probe MSN – Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 9/21/2022 An appeals court sided with the Justice Department in a legal fight over classified documents seized in a court-authorized search of former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, ruling the FBI may use the documents in its ongoing criminal investigation. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:59 am
Smith (4th Cir. 1998); United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
